Top100Hub
Home Trend IntelligenceTrends Reviews & GuidesReviews
Browse

Evidence checked every hour · Eastern Time

Top 100 Websites

Public websites ranked strictly by reconciled popularity positions from independent web-scale datasets.

Jump to the ranking Email me changes My Rankings

Popularity ranking

Today’s Top 10 Websites

10 shown first · 100 ranked entries
  1. 01 —
    Google
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    100 Strong support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has strong support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #1; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Strong agreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Strong agreement across comparable source positions

    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #1 · global popularity rank #1

    retrieved
    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #1 · global popularity rank #1

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

  2. 02 —
    Microsoft
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    100 Strong support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has strong support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #2; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Strong agreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Strong agreement across comparable source positions

    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #6 · global popularity rank #6

    retrieved
    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #9 · global popularity rank #9

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

  3. 03 —
    Facebook
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    92 Good support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #3; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions

    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #2 · global popularity rank #2

    retrieved
    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #3 · global popularity rank #3

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

  4. 04 —
    YouTube
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    92 Good support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #4; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions

    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #3 · global popularity rank #3

    retrieved
    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #9 · global popularity rank #9

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

  5. 05 —
    Apple
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    96 Strong support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has strong support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #5; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Mixed agreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Mixed agreement across comparable source positions

    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #7 · global popularity rank #7

    retrieved
    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #10 · global popularity rank #10

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

  6. 06 —
    Instagram
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    92 Good support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #6; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions

    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #4 · global popularity rank #4

    retrieved
    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #11 · global popularity rank #11

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

  7. 07 —
    LinkedIn
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    92 Good support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #7; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions

    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #6 · global popularity rank #6

    retrieved
    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #18 · global popularity rank #18

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

  8. 08 ↑1
    GitHub
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    92 Good support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #8; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions

    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #10 · global popularity rank #10

    retrieved
    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #29 · global popularity rank #29

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

  9. 09 ↑1
    Amazon
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    92 Good support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #9; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions

    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #24 · global popularity rank #24

    retrieved
    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #30 · global popularity rank #30

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

  10. 10 ↓2
    X
    Websites · eligibility verified
    Verified Multi-source evidence
    92 Good support
    Why this position?

    Evidence summary

    Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.

    ✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source current

    FluxScore factors

    Popularity position
    Current chart position #10; separate from FluxScore
    Evidence support
    3 supporting of 4 checked datasets
    Source agreement
    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
    Evidence freshness
    Last source check 2026-09-26
    Community sentiment
    Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged

    FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

    Item-level source evidence

    3 supporting · 1 missing

    Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions

    Majestic Million Primary evidence

    Source position #16 · global popularity rank #16

    retrieved
    Tranco top-sites ranking Primary evidence

    Source position #50 · global popularity rank #50

    retrieved

    Immutable rank history

    Method-versioned snapshots

    Open this explanation to load verified historical movement.

    Strengths

    • Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
    • Duplicate entries are removed before publication.

    Weaknesses

    • The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.

    Community check

    Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.

Start with today’s leaders, then open the complete evidence-backed list when you want more.

Independent rankings

About the Top 100 Websites chart

Top100Hub's Top 100 Websites chart for 2026 is designed to make a changing public ranking easy to inspect and verify. A strictly popularity-based website chart that reconciles independent global traffic and domain-ranking datasets. Each published chart shows its latest update, movement, eligibility status, source datasets, and high-level FluxScore factors.

How is the Top 100 Websites chart ranked?

FluxScore is a whole-number rating showing how trustworthy the evidence behind an entry is. It considers how many reliable sources support it, whether they agree, how current they are, and where the information came from. For sports statistics, an official league or trusted statistics source may be enough. Each refresh tries every dataset listed for that chart, but only sources that actually support an entry can increase its FluxScore. FluxScore does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.

How often is this ranking updated?

FluxCrawler checks approved sources every hour. The page distinguishes the latest source check, successful data refresh and material ranking change; each source keeps its own publication schedule.