OpenTable Top 100 Restaurants
Supporting evidence
Source position #2 · verified current selection presence · position #2
retrievedEvidence checked every hour · Eastern Time
Top 100 Restaurants
Restaurants worldwide ranked by agreement across independent dining awards and review programs.
The world's most popular hotels, restaurants, destinations and attractions
Market pulse
Stock price ticker
Loading stock ticker…
Loading market status and current prices…
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #1; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 3 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
3 supporting · 7 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
La Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #7 · La Liste score 99.5 · position #7
retrievedThe World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #80 · expert-voted worldwide rank #80
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 3 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #2; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 3 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
3 supporting · 7 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
OpenTable Top 100 Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #1 · verified current selection presence · position #1
retrievedThe World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #98 · expert-voted worldwide rank #98
retrievedLa Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #1299 · La Liste score 75 · position #1299
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by 3 independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #3; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
The World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #4 · expert-voted worldwide rank #4
retrievedLa Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #30 · La Liste score 98.5 · position #30
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpenTable Top 100 Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #4; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Strong agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingStrong agreement across comparable source positions
La Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #13 · La Liste score 99 · position #13
retrievedThe World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #20 · expert-voted worldwide rank #20
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpenTable Top 100 Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #5; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
The World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #1 · expert-voted worldwide rank #1
retrievedLa Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #206 · La Liste score 94.5 · position #206
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpenTable Top 100 Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #6; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Strong agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingStrong agreement across comparable source positions
The World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #14 · expert-voted worldwide rank #14
retrievedLa Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #23 · La Liste score 99 · position #23
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpenTable Top 100 Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #7; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
The World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #3 · expert-voted worldwide rank #3
retrievedLa Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #125 · La Liste score 96 · position #125
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpenTable Top 100 Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #8; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
The World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #2 · expert-voted worldwide rank #2
retrievedLa Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #380 · La Liste score 91 · position #380
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpenTable Top 100 Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #9; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Mixed agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMixed agreement across comparable source positions
La Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #15 · La Liste score 99 · position #15
retrievedThe World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #38 · expert-voted worldwide rank #38
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpenTable Top 100 Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #10; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
The World's 50 Best Restaurants Primary evidenceSource position #5 · expert-voted worldwide rank #5
retrievedLa Liste 2026 · Restaurants Supporting evidenceSource position #218 · La Liste score 94 · position #218
retrievedMICHELIN Guide Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedTripadvisor Travelers' Choice Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Culinary Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedGault & Millau selections No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpinionated About Dining global list No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedOpenTable Top 100 Restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedJames Beard Awards No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedWorld Travel Awards restaurants No item-level support foundinput checked; no exact item-level match, so this input scored zero
retrievedImmutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #11; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Mixed agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMixed agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #12; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Mixed agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMixed agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #13; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Link review needed ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #14; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #15; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #16; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #17; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #18; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Link review needed ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #19; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #20; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #21; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #22; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #23; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #24; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #25; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #26; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Link review needed ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #27; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #28; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Mixed agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMixed agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #29; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #30; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #31; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Link review needed ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #32; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #33; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Link review needed ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #34; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #35; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #36; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Mixed agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMixed agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #37; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #38; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #39; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #40; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Mixed agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMixed agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #41; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Strong agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingStrong agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #42; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #43; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #44; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Strong agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingStrong agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #45; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #46; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #47; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Mixed agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMixed agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #48; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #49; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #50; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #51; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #52; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #53; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Mixed agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMixed agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #54; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #55; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #56; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #57; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Strong agreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingStrong agreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #58; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #59; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #60; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #61; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #62; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #63; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Link review needed ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #64; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #65; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #66; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #67; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #68; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #69; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #70; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #71; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #72; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #73; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #74; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #75; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #76; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #77; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #78; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #79; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #80; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #81; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #82; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #83; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Link review needed ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #84; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #85; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #86; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #87; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #88; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #89; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 2 independent datasets; the current FluxScore has good support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #90; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 2 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Meaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
2 supporting · 8 missingMeaningful disagreement across comparable source positions
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Supported by two independent item-level datasets.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #91; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #92; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #93; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #94; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #95; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #96; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #97; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #98; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #99; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
-
Why this position?
Evidence summary
Top100Hub found item-level support in 1 independent dataset; the current FluxScore has developing support. Open the source evidence below for the traceable basis and limitations.
✓ Policy-checked HTTPS ● Source currentFluxScore factors
- Popularity position
- Current chart position #100; separate from FluxScore
- Evidence support
- 1 supporting of 10 checked datasets
- Source agreement
- Single comparable source
- Evidence freshness
- Last source check 2026-09-26
- Community sentiment
- Separate context; rank and FluxScore are unchanged
FluxScore shows how trustworthy the evidence is. It does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
Item-level source evidence
1 supporting · 9 missingSingle comparable source
Open this explanation to retrieve the current item-level source records.
Immutable rank history
Method-versioned snapshotsOpen this explanation to load verified historical movement.
Strengths
- Only one item-level supporting dataset is currently available.
- Duplicate entries are removed before publication.
Weaknesses
- The underlying ranking is estimated because exact audited totals are unavailable.
- Only one listed dataset supported this entry in the latest check.
Community check
Helpful context only—it cannot change the ranking or FluxScore.
Independent rankings
About the Top 100 Restaurants chart
Top100Hub's Top 100 Restaurants chart for 2026 is designed to make a changing public ranking easy to inspect and verify. A worldwide restaurant popularity ranking checking ten dining datasets, with every result linking to its official website. Each published chart shows its latest update, movement, eligibility status, source datasets, and high-level FluxScore factors.
How is the Top 100 Restaurants chart ranked?
FluxScore is a whole-number rating showing how trustworthy the evidence behind an entry is. It considers how many reliable sources support it, whether they agree, how current they are, and where the information came from. For sports statistics, an official league or trusted statistics source may be enough. Each refresh tries every dataset listed for that chart, but only sources that actually support an entry can increase its FluxScore. FluxScore does not measure popularity or decide rankings, and community opinions cannot change it.
How often is this ranking updated?
FluxCrawler checks approved sources every hour. The page distinguishes the latest source check, successful data refresh and material ranking change; each source keeps its own publication schedule.